Hard decisions. Where we live there are two towering London plane trees that rise high above the houses. They are majestic. Not ancient: two saplings probably first took hold here about 100 years ago; now their boughs are intertwined. But there’s a problem. Their vast trunks are pushing hard against a neighbour’s wall and they’re concerned about their safety, not to mention the very visible damage that’s being done to their building. After years of toing and froing, it looks as though the trees will have to go. But taking down a tree is emotive and people want to know where we stand on the issue.
Meanwhile, on London’s Oxford Street, there’s a divisive debate about the future of a Marks & Spencer department store. The owners want to demolish it as it no longer serves their needs and replace it with a greener, more sustainable edifice. The critics say that the carbon released by this could outweigh all the benefits of a more sustainable building rising here. It’s a version of the same dilemma facing people who want to switch to an electric vehicle – will it be of more benefit to the planet than sticking with the same old petrol car for 25 years? – or airlines considering junking planes that are only a few years old but already considered fuel-gobbling dinosaurs.
Or how about this debate that happened in Hong Kong? Would you build a towering, small-footprint skyscraper if it allowed you to create a green park at its base, or would you reduce the height of the building and use all of the available space because people usually have better mental-health outcomes when they have easier access to the street?
Perhaps you can skim this list and know with certainty what’s right and wrong but the nature of hard decisions, especially those concerning the cities we live in – and love – is that often it’s not even about right and wrong. It’s about accepting that there will be loss, some disappointment, as we try to do the best we can. Not good people and bad people – just folk struggling with genuinely difficult choices and learning to accept compromises. I think the trees should come down.
Has anything stayed with you since the pandemic? I mean good things – not, say, a persistent cough or several extra kilos. While the big tree debate might have had its trickier moments, there’s still a whiff of lockdown camaraderie in the air where I live. Perhaps my favourite thing to have remained from those days is the bond that my partner and I now have with our neighbour, Leo, who is 86. At the end of every day, we ring his doorbell and then we water the plants together in our stretch of the mews. Leo gets the hose; we get the watering cans. As we attend to the agapanthus and oleander, we catch up on what’s occurred over the past 24 hours and discuss trips to be organised (we are all off to the wedding of our former neighbours Matt and Holly).
Leo is sharp and if passers-by stop to admire our blossoming handiwork he often pretends to be our put-upon gardener. “I’d love to chat,” he whispers, “but the governors here will dock my wages if I talk too much.” He’s got rather too convincing of late and people have started to give us an unforgiving eye.
And he has good stories. We were in an Uber the other day and he was telling us about how he came to England as a boy, leaving behind a tough life in Ireland and hoping to make it in the city. When the train reached London, he found the stationmaster and asked if there was any work going. The next day he was employed in the station (he later became a dresser in the movies in the 1960s, then the West End, before working for years as a butler for a group of lawyers). When we reached our destination, our driver, a Somali man, said, “Sir, I hope you don’t mind but I was listening to your story and, you know, that is my story too.” Leo was touched and they shook hands. Two men who had made a difficult journey (in life, not the Uber), hoping for something better. I felt obliged to give a very good tip. That will be coming off Leo’s wages.