Opinion / Andrew Tuck
Building consensus
The property industry is in a moment of epic transition that’s being embraced – well, mostly – as a chance to do things better. However, the more honest attendees at Mipim, the sector’s largest event, which is taking place in Cannes this week, will also admit that there are some problems too. At one background briefing, someone from a leading investor said that projects involving US office space had become “uninvestable” because of the shift to working from home. “There’s a shortage of housing in Dublin,” said another speaker, who was worried that well-meaning social policies were having unintended consequences. “But why would we invest in building homes there when rent increases are capped at 2 per cent a year and we can’t borrow money at less than 8 per cent?” The push to meet climate-change-related demands was also an area where developers were finding both amazing opportunities and, sometimes, controls that stopped them from stepping forward.
Charles Begley, chief executive of the London Property Alliance, which represents the city’s leading developers and investors, highlighted one tricky debate. The group’s recent report, Retrofit First, Not Retrofit Only, argues that there needs to be a more nuanced approach to deciding whether a building should be repurposed or pulled down and that the move by some cities to ban demolition might backfire. “The politicisation of retrofitting is eroding the ability to drive sustainable outcomes by retaining buildings that really are obsolete and for which the viability for investing just does not exist,” he said in Cannes.
So what needs to happen to bring developers, investors and civic leaders together on hot-button topics such as this? The answer seems to be an acceptance, especially when the global economy is so shaky, that progress is inevitable but will require compromises.
Andrew Tuck is Monocle’s editor in chief. For the full report, listen to ‘The Urbanist’ at 19.00 London time tonight or as a podcast whenever it suits you.