It was a night to remember, even for South Korea – a country accustomed to political turmoil and social unrest along its 77-year road to democracy. President Yoon Suk Yeol’s martial-law declaration in December was short-lived but it succeeded in unleashing a flood of political and social complications that continue to this day. 

While news traffic has surged, so too has distrust in traditional journalism. The struggle to hold on to audiences has intensified as their interpretations of news have become increasingly polarised. Meanwhile, balanced reporting has become more difficult, with fringe views harder to ignore. News outlets have been accused of misrepresenting information while conspiracy theories have run rampant in the months since. Youtube algorithms are convincing radicals – both progressive and conservative – that their beliefs are the truth.

To the democratic audience worldwide, the case was clear-cut. Yoon’s martial-law decree, which banned all political activities and placed the media and doctors under military supervision, was swiftly judged in the courts. But the question for the media in South Korea has been how to report the nitty gritty of his trials without burying the bigger picture. 

At The Korea Herald, we provide an inside perspective for global readers and strive to report in a way that provides context. During those six hours of martial law, we glimpsed what being robbed of our freedom of speech might look like. But the turmoil also united the country’s news outlets, regardless of their political persuasions, and reinforced our fundamental purpose. It highlighted how journalism exists to assist people’s judgement and not lead it, and how safeguarding the credibility of the media has become even more important to ensuring a sound democracy.

Lee Joo-Hee is the managing director of The Korea Herald.

Want more stories like these in your inbox?

Sign up to Monocle’s email newsletters to stay on top of news and opinion, plus the latest from the magazine, radio, film and shop.