Opinion / Josh Fehnert
Tale of two cities
Venice has always been divided from the rest of Italy, at times by a millennium of independence, at others just a stretch of salty lagoon. Now a vote on 1 December will rule whether the city’s eastern reaches (the 100 or so scattered islands you see on the postcards or from cruise-ship portholes) should be governed separately from mainland Mestre, a rough-and-ready post-industrial port.
This friction isn’t new: the islands were only united with Mestre under fascism in 1926 and today, some say, the two sides of the city have little in common. But Venice mayor Luigi Brugnaro, who's in favour of keeping the city together, is right to condemn this argument. Breaking up alliances promises quick fixes but – as we’re seeing with the environmental crisis, trade wars and the redrawing of treaties – smashing ties doesn’t stop the rot. In fact it usually diminishes the resources needed to deal with the issues.
Venice’s historic centre is buckling with over-tourism and a dwindling population (1,000 Venetians leave every year and half the population is over 65). A vote to split the historic city, however, would likely accelerate its decline and diminish its resources to fight the blight. It might also hamper Mestre’s chance to cash in on its island cousin’s 20 million visitors a year. Lose-lose.