Opinion / Josh Fehnert
Light reading
Bad lighting takes a heavy toll on the health of living things according to a new report in online journal Aging and Mechanisms of Disease. The peer-reviewed paper’s findings suggest that exposure to LED light disrupts sleep patterns, speeds up ageing and increases stress in organisms – at least, it does among the obliging fruit flies that were tested.
Are you surprised? Aren’t we all at least dimly aware of the negative feelings brought on by strip-lit supermarkets? No one feels good in the over-lit bluish pall cast by energy-saving bulbs or backlit screens, either. And obviously this isn’t purely an aesthetic issue but there is such a thing as flattering light.
More importantly, better lighting should be discussed when we create homes, offices, shops and airports; they should all be places that feel cosy and healthy. Architects and industrial designers have long had a knack for getting the light right even though LED bulbs cast a less appealing glow than their incandescent cousins.
Some people still have supposedly bright ideas about design but miss the glaringly obvious merits of sidelights and shade. To them I offer some counsel, first uttered long before this peer-reviewed fly paper demonstrated the dark side of overdone lighting: “Were it not for shadows there would be no beauty,” wrote Japanese author Junichiro Tanizaki in 1933. No need to turn to an insect for proof; you already know that it’s time for a switch. Might we suggest a dimmer?