Opinion / Tyler Brûlé
Kia ora-voir?
Once upon a time, the civil-aviation industry spoke of flagship routes where national carriers flew their colours on exotic tarmac, showed off their newest aircraft and demonstrated a bit of soft power in emerging markets and former colonies. While many city pairs and round-the-world services weren’t exactly profitable, the appearance of gleaming metal and colourful tailfins helped cement the reputations of many of the world’s biggest carriers.
But it’s no surprise that, in a constantly challenged sector, many such routes have disappeared. From next October another will become part of Commonwealth aviation history: Air New Zealand will no longer fly to London, a destination it’s served in one form or another since 1982. Citing better returns by operating direct nonstops, the carrier has said that New York’s Newark Airport will replace Heathrow and become its latest destination.
For sure, the Los Angeles stop between London and Auckland was always a pain but, rather than retreating from Europe, Air New Zealand should be looking at ways to better serve it. Why not a route via Bangkok or a hop through Hong Kong, as the carrier has done in the past? New York is exciting but there seem to be stronger links to London than the Big Apple. Or maybe not? Kiwis have certainly begun to look at cities other than the UK capital for work abroad so perhaps the decision is legitimate. Nevertheless, the ties that bind the Commonwealth will be a bit more frayed 12 months from now.