Opinion / Christopher Cermak
Macron’s nativist moment
For a leader who built his soft-power brand on uniting Europe, France’s Emmanuel Macron has had a mixed few weeks. First he angered many EU allies by blocking the start of accession talks with Albania and North Macedonia. Then, in an interview with right-wing French magazine Valeurs actuelles, he said he preferred legal migrants from Ivory Coast and Guinea to illegal “clandestine networks” coming from Bulgaria and Ukraine. The latter two countries – Bulgaria, an EU member whose citizens have a right to live and work legally anywhere in the bloc and Ukraine, a membership hopeful whose citizens were granted visa-free EU travel in 2017 – promptly called their French ambassadors for an explanation.
The brash comments are jarring since Macron has long sought to be Europe’s de facto leader. Bulgarian president Rumen Radev was quick to note the irony, saying Macron “will find it hard to achieve EU leadership with such unmeasured comments”. There is, however, one reading by which Macron’s comments seem less contradictory: could the French leader be quietly developing his own brand of nativism?
The nativist argument runs something like this: a deeper and closer European Union, yes, but only for the EU’s most promising and developed (read: western) members. In some ways Macron has been making this argument for years by pushing for a “two-speed” Europe in which some countries integrate faster than others. Such a stance might also help him at home where he needs to fend off the looming far-right sentiments of Marine Le Pen and her National Rally party. But popularity in France comes at a price: is it worth further dividing Europe to win another election? Apparently so.