Opinion / Nolan Giles
Home is where the heart is
The shade beneath the cantilevered roof of Brisbane’s Gallery of Modern Art (Goma), with lizards scurrying around subtropical flora nearby, is a good spot to sit and reflect on the thoughtfulness of design by which Australia’s cultural institutions are marked. The quality of lead architects (and Australians) Kerry and Lindsay Clare’s design for Goma (pictured) marries harmoniously with its neighbouring 1982 modernist marvel: the Queensland Art Gallery (QAG). The much-loved design for the latter came from a local master architect, Robin Gibson, who embraced the notion of shrubbery clambering around and over a sunken concrete building.
Ever since Denmark’s Jørn Utzon threw down the gauntlet in 1957 with his design for the Sydney Opera House, Aussie architects have proven their worth in forging the nation’s finest buildings – and a major factor is their understanding of context and climate. Which is why it saddens me when I receive yet another press release declaring that a big-name international architect has been commissioned to design an important Australian building. While I’m not criticising today’s news that Japan’s Pritzker prize-winner Sanaa has broken ground on an extension to Sydney’s Art Gallery of New South Wales, I’m not particularly excited by it either.
Sydney’s track record with big-name architects includes uninspiring buildings from Frank Gehry and Rogers Stirk Harbour + Partners, which both feel out of place in the harbour city. As an Australian (today tasked with writing about the world's best architects) I'd still much rather back a local who’s cut their teeth working with my country’s unique – and often difficult – terrain and weather. Developers down under, who see greener grass elsewhere, might be wise to spend a bit more time with me (and the lizards) in the shade of Goma.