Opinion / Fiona Wilson
City shakedown
London, New York, Tokyo and Paris are (in that order) the most “comprehensively attractive” cities in the world. So says the Global Power City Index (GPCI) 2019, a detailed report compiled by the Mori Memorial Foundation’s Institute for Urban Strategies, a Tokyo-based consultancy. The annual index has been ranking cities since 2008; this year’s survey looked at more than 40 metropolises using 70 indicators covering everything from business to the environment. This year four new cities were added, including Melbourne and Dublin, and new categories scrutinised, among them tourist attractions, nightlife and public-transport use.
The report is overseen by a committee of urbanism professors from around the world and chaired by Heizo Takenaka, a Japanese economist and retired politician. What emerges is a fascinating picture of the strengths and weaknesses of the world’s cities. Tokyo, for example, is miles ahead when it comes to restaurants but could improve workplace flexibility; Seoul is great for R&D but poor on liveability. New York scored highly on economic indicators but fell short on liveability, and therefore risks talent shifting to other cities and countries. London topped the list but has the potential to stall with Brexit uncertainty, while Paris is on the up after winning the race to host the 2024 Olympics. European cities such as Zürich and Stockholm lead the way on environmental issues, while Asian cities overall fared less well on green matters.
At yesterday’s launch press conference, Takenaka said that it was up to Japan’s government to tackle issues such as lowering corporate tax to boost the capital’s economy. China too is key, as the impact of its somewhat sluggish economy and ongoing trade war with the US is being felt in cities the world over. In other words, it’ll take more than municipalities to shore up cities’ strengths and address their weaknesses.