Opinion / Nic Monisse
Efficiency drive
Despite the historically low levels of traffic in the US over recent months, road fatalities, according to the latest study from the National Highway Safety Administration, have hit a 15-year high. Many urbanists have attributed the jump in deaths – a 32 per cent increase – not to bad driving but to poor road design that entices speeding. Streets with wide lanes, generous corner radii and no footpaths or trees tempt drivers to put their foot to the floor when traffic lanes are empty.
The solution then, it seems, is to resize our roads by slimming traffic lanes and tightening up corners. These infrastructure changes would hopefully make drivers more cautious by forcing them to slow down. Conveniently, they would also create friendlier environments for pedestrians. But planners and ambitious civic officials might soon hit a roadblock: the existing conditions are often mandated to ensure that a municipality’s larger service vehicles, such as bin lorries and fire engines, can easily navigate the city. In my former life as an urban designer in Perth, Australia (have I mentioned that before?), I’ve seen such requirements scupper plans for more people-friendly streets. A generous plaza space, for example, had its pedestrian area squeezed to allow for the movements of a bin lorry with the turning circle of a Boeing 747.
To right-size our streets, then, we need to right-size our service fleets. It’s not a new idea – the Volpe Center at the US Department of Transport has previously advocated for smaller service vehicles. Doing so while making such vehicles more nimble would allow planners to make our streets slimmer and safer – and, as an added bonus, miniature fire engines and bin lorries look particularly cute.