Opinion / Andrew Tuck
Shock resistant
Yesterday, London’s restaurants were doing a brisk trade, lunch spots had queues of people waiting for takeaways and shops were busy with customers making high-speed Christmas purchases. And today? Well, the city is back in lockdown – along with the rest of England – for at least four weeks. In March, when the first lockdown started, everything in the city closed overnight. Even businesses that were allowed to continue operating often decided that they would pull down the shutters and wait out the storm. It will be different this time.
From taxi drivers to shopkeepers, pub landlords to business owners, there’s a determination to keep things ticking over. This is not based on denial, nor a desire to ignore the rules. It’s just that people are learning to live with the virus and, importantly, have grown weary of scare tactics. Trying to frighten people to stay home, to not see friends, to not earn a living, is a manoeuvre that soon runs out of impact.
This week, MPs had the chance to quiz England’s chief medical officer, Chris Whitty, as well as Patrick Vallance (pictured), the UK’s chief scientific advisor, about the data they presented last Saturday to justify the imposition of a new lockdown. A key focus of the MPs’ raised eyebrows was a petrifying suggestion that the country could be facing 4,000 coronavirus-related deaths every day in just a matter of weeks. It’s an outlier number that seems fanciful to many commentators and scientists who believe that it was given extra emphasis because it would scare people into accepting the lockdown.
During his questioning, Vallance apologised if the number had scared people. It is too late for that. Politicians, the media and the public are increasingly sceptical because they feel that they have been manipulated by misleading charts and the badly framed presentation of data. They want something that’s measured and treats them with respect.
This links to another story making the headlines today – the surprising performance of Donald Trump in the US presidential election. Although much of the focus in recent days has been on the risk of civil war, blood on the streets, culture wars, of coronavirus never being curtailed, it seems that more US voters than predicted by pollsters refused to focus on the scares and voted for something simpler: the promise of more money in their wallets.