Opinion / Nic Monisse
Field experts
When I was practicing as a landscape architect and told someone about my work, more often than not, people would try to be funny and ask me to design their back garden for free. That, or they would ask which fertiliser they should use on their begonias.
Sometimes I’d cave and fabricate a recommendation (“Dr Potty’s is particularly good right before spring”). Other times, I’d launch into a tirade explaining that the role of a landscape architect reaches much further than back gardens, melding planning and architecture, and playing a critical role in shaping public spaces and connecting the built environment with nature.
It’s understandable, then, that I felt a little relief earlier this month when US designer Julie Bargmann was announced as the inaugural winner of the Oberlander prize – landscape architecture’s answer to the Pritzker, the architecture industry’s top gong.
Established by the Washington-based Cultural Landscape Foundation and named after celebrated practitioner Cornelia Hahn Oberlander, the $100,000 (€86,000) award aims to increase the public’s understanding of the profession. By spotlighting work that is groundbreaking and essential, the prize should help to independently set the direction and enhance an appreciation of the practice.
The hope is that landscape architecture’s most accomplished designers, such as Bargmann, will become household names, in much the same way that Kenzo Tange and Frank Gehry’s profiles grew beyond the design community after they claimed architecture’s most famous gong. For the discipline as a whole, this can only be a good thing. And, selfishly, I’m hoping that it will also mean fewer requests for pro-bono garden work.