Opinion / Carlota Rebelo
How Cop26 failed
After 13 days, at least 336 hours and about 250,000 cups of coffee, the UN Climate Change Conference, Cop26, has finally drawn to a close. Banners have been taken down in Glasgow, the free electric buses across the city are back in their depot and most of the nearly 30,000 attendees have returned to their home countries. This gathering had been described by experts as the “summit of our time”, the last chance for world leaders to come together and implement the policies needed to keep global warming within the 1.5C target. But despite getting off to a good start, with passionate speeches and even some significant pledges announced, Cop26 failed to deliver.
One of the main threads across the entire summit – and a sticking point that remained during the final hours of negotiations – was financing for climate adaptation. Developing nations, most of which are already dealing with the consequences of rising temperatures, were asking richer nations to step up and take responsibility rather than haggling over the language in the agreement. Hours before negotiations were due to end on Friday, the People’s Summit for Climate Justice, composed of activists and campaigners, took to the stage to voice their frustration with the lack of results. Hundreds of delegates, including members of trade unions, environmental organisations and campaigners, walked out of Cop26 in protest.
Just two weeks ago the international community was buzzing with hope. Now, the air is heavy with a sense of acquiescence to the fact that the thorniest questions will have to be left to Cop27 in Egypt next year. Following the shortcomings of this edition, the words of Mia Mottley, prime minister of Barbados (pictured), ring truer than ever. “The goal of 1.5C is what we need to survive,” she told the conference. “Two degrees is a death sentence.”
For more from Carlota Rebelo on the way forward after Cop26, tune in to today’s edition of ‘The Globalist’ on Monocle 24.