Opinion / Nic Monisse
Walls come tumbling down
Residents in Detroit and Oklahoma City have, in recent days, woken up to find some of their most famous architectural structures being demolished. In Michigan’s biggest city, the Packard Motor Car Company plant is being razed. Albert Kahn’s 1903 structure, which pioneered the use of reinforced concrete, was abandoned and became a hub for the city’s underground rave and music scene in the 1990s, before being left to ruin and blight. In Oklahoma City, meanwhile, the famous First Christian Church (pictured) was also torn down. Dubbed The Egg because of its striking modernist design by local firm Conner & Pojezny, it was a much-loved community gathering place and, after the church moved out, some proposed that it be transformed into a cultural building after some repairs.
But while both cities are losing architectural heritage, the responses to the two demolitions have been markedly different. The Packard plant’s destruction has been celebrated, while The Egg’s ending has been met with an outpouring of grief and anger. This, I think, provides an answer to the perennial preservation question: how do we decide which of our architecturally significant buildings to save?
Unless buildings are in a total state of disrepair, as in the case of the Packard plant, every effort should be made to conserve structures that have architectural value, are beloved by the people who live around them and have the potential to serve a contemporary purpose. Such renovation can be a win for design enthusiasts, developers and the communities that those buildings serve. In Oklahoma City, The Egg could have formed the centrepiece of a grand mixed-use project, adding appeal for potential buyers and investors. Instead, the site will most likely be another cheap and soulless modern development that’s lacking character and a place in citizens’ hearts. If it is, then the site’s owners will have demolished its own reputation.
Nic Monisse is Monocle’s deputy design editor.