THE FASTER LANE / TYLER BRÛLÉ
Open to question
For the past two weeks I’ve been spending a lot of time – almost too much – in the company of medical professionals. Some are old-school surgeons, others new-school doctors who specialise in viruses and lungs, and many more are nurses and technicians, trainees and orderlies. Late last Wednesday I enjoyed a sunny evening with a friend who’s a surgeon at one of Switzerland’s bigger teaching hospitals. Over a perfect bottle of local rosé (did you know that the canton of Zürich has its own vineyards?) he posed a curious question. “You know this two-metre distancing rule?” he said. “No one really knows where this came from. It’s become the foundation policy of many health ministries – there’s a lot of shared research between countries – but it’s hard to pinpoint the thinking about two metres and if this really makes much sense.”
As he refilled my glass we appropriately moved to the topic of restaurants and bars, and what the coming months might look like. Before long we concluded that it was going to be hard for governments to back-pedal on the two-metre policy after so many weeks of driving home the message. We decided that this was the reason why we’ve yet to see a government come forward with a workable policy for restaurateurs and barkeepers.
Tomorrow, Switzerland will kick-start a large part of its service sector when hairdressers, beauty parlours and physios reopen for business (more on this in tomorrow’s Monocle Minute); in two weeks the entire retail sector will be back in business. Bern, in line with Vienna and Berlin, has so far chosen to kick its country’s gastronomy sector into the grass for the time being as opening restaurants will throw much of the distance thinking out of the window. Restaurant owners see no value in opening establishments that will need to be at least 60 per cent empty as everyone knows that it’s not much fun sitting in a deserted pizzeria or brasserie – no matter how attentive the service or tasty the bites. The same holds true for airlines and rail companies: two metres is not going to work on an Airbus A320 and requiring all occupants to wear masks isn’t going to solve the problem either.
Since the start of the outbreak in Europe, many academics and economists (as well as many millions of disillusioned citizens) have been raising the rather complicated question about what society would accept in terms of death toll versus a functioning economy/society. Did it make sense for Norway to totally shut down the way it did? Or should it have pursued the debatable Swedish model? Would it have been better to pursue a policy of protecting only the most vulnerable and live with the fact that even though others outside the “zone” might die, it would nevertheless be seen as politically and morally palatable?
I left the sunny garden bench considering these questions and one word that’s becoming more than a little overused: resilience. Ministerial speeches, news packages and corporate communications all like to employ the word to highlight how society has pulled through “these extraordinary times” – but have we? Is it correct to say that every country has demonstrated resilience? If a depleted healthcare system has failed to cope – no matter how hard its doctors and nurses have worked – is that resilience? There’s a lot of talk about everyone pulling together and doing their bit. But if that’s really the case, then why have so many countries flown in tens of thousands of seasonal farm workers from Eastern Europe (talk about undermining your stay-at-home policies), while many more of their own citizens, who could easily have been mobilised to pick and pack fruit and vegetables, have been sitting at home while furloughed?
We are suffering at the hands of myriad entrenched systems that have spent too much time and money attempting to remove risk and chance from daily life, while also creating a climate in which it’s perfectly acceptable to fly in workers from around the world to do essential tasks (logistics, nursing, fruit-picking). All the while, billions of euros are wasted making everyone else think that they need a BA or MBA to get by in life. Such measures don’t make for a resilient society.