Opinion / Christopher Cermak
New age of politics
Finnish prime minister Sanna Marin became the world’s youngest-serving state leader last month when she was sworn in at age 34 – but she hasn’t kept the title for long. Today the mantle will be passed to Austria’s Sebastian Kurz. And, despite being just 33 years old, this isn’t Kurz’s first stint as chancellor: he’s been re-elected after the collapse of his last government in May.
As in Finland, it’s not only Austria’s leader who has youth on his side. The whole cabinet in Vienna is getting a generational makeover (not to mention the government filling half of all positions with women). The country’s new justice minister is a 35-year-old former Bosnian refugee, the integration minister is also 35 and the new finance minister is 38. Much of the focus of these new governments has been on gender (in the case of Finland) or party coalitions (in the case of Austria, where Kurz’s conservatives engineered a swing from a partnership with the far right to an accord with the Greens). But age shouldn’t be ignored either.
As a thirtysomething myself – one who, like many of my generation, occasionally wonders whether my elders have spent my pension and soured the planet – I suppose I should be pleased that I’m now well represented in government. But it also leaves me with an odd feeling: if I’m not leading a country in my thirties, what have I done with my life? More seriously, I wonder whether I’d really be ready to have that level of responsibility thrust upon me now. Is anyone ready at my age? Sure, our politics need refreshing but is a youthful leader really going to deliver change in a sensible way? Time will tell whether the young are really capable of responsible government. Finland and Austria are the testing grounds. And there might be one person watching this experiment more keenly than most: Pete Buttigieg. At 37, the US presidential hopeful is practically a veteran.