Opinion / NIC MONISSE
Solid advice
In my previous life as an urban designer for city hall in Perth, Australia, part of my role involved reviewing designs for new buildings. The aim was to ensure that they ticked a number of boxes – boxes that focused more on what architects and developers couldn’t do (build really steep access ramps, say) rather than what they should, such as ensuring that street-level façades were active and engaging. Frustratingly, it seemed that the exercise was more about meeting minimum requirements than pushing quality architecture. It’s why I was particularly excited by Melbourne’s recent announcement of two new independent bodies that will champion – not just regulate – design in the city.
Soon to be composed of a select group of architects and urban designers, the newly minted Melbourne Design Review Panel and Design Excellence Advisory Committee will, respectively, provide advice on development applications and set the agenda for good design in the city. The move is spurred on by the fact that the Victorian capital has in recent years, by its own admission, allowed the construction of poor buildings that add nothing to the city’s vibrancy and street life – think enormous and lifeless walls of glass fronting what should be an inviting pedestrian streetscape.
And while it’s not a new concept (review panels are common in many cities), it’s a big win for Melbourne. More than just improving designers’ CVs, it offers resident creatives a chance to weigh in on good design and actively shape their city, without the cost and client constraints of their own projects. It’s reason enough for designers in Melbourne to put their names down for a spot on the panel or committee, and why designers elsewhere – from London to Bristol, and Seattle to New York – should sign up for similar groups in their respective cities too.