Opinion / Ed Stocker
Turning their backs
There has already been much talk about how swiftly the Taliban took control of Afghanistan. Much talk, too, about the defiant stance of Joe Biden, who had made it one of his election pledges to get the last US troops out of the country. What’s clear – no matter how it’s branded by any of the powers that had boots on the ground – is that few contingency plans were ever drawn up. The only plan was to get out and get out fast.
Despite the Taliban’s assurances that they are now version 2.0 – cuddlier and more open to women’s rights – the scenes of desperation at Kabul’s airport are an early warning of the humanitarian fallout that’s just beginning. The nations that invested a 20-year presence in Afghanistan, including Canada and the UK alongside the US, should be aware that this is the consequence of a poorly thought-out exit strategy and they need to assume responsibility for what happens next.
The thorny issue of illegal immigration has already caused tensions within the EU, with the likes of Italy and Greece complaining that responsibility is not shared equally. Will more refugees try to reach European shores by road and boat in the coming months? That seems likely. Accepting a sizeable number of Afghan refugees is one way to mitigate this problem – although when will a neat figure ever be enough? And any resettlement scheme shouldn’t be limited to only the translators, fixers and journalists who have aided Western countries. The White House has set aside $500m (€427m) and is drawing up special immigration visas for Afghans but it hasn’t announced how many people the US will allow in. The UK and Canada have each promised to welcome up to 20,000 Afghans, yet the latter’s home secretary, Priti Patel, says that the UK’s share will only be 5,000 for the first year as it would be impossible to take that many refugees at once. As for the ones kept waiting? Too little, too late.