Opinion / James Chambers
After party
Boris Johnson isn’t the only world leader dealing with a “partygate” headache. Hong Kong’s chief executive Carrie Lam is facing questions about a recent birthday party attended by senior officials and a host of pro-Beijing lawmakers. The event, involving 170 people, went against official coronavirus-related guidance and saw a busload of these patriotic party boys and girls being carted off to the city’s quarantine camp (pictured), for a few weeks of solitary detention and self-reflection.
As investigations continue, this evolving scandal has provided a timely reminder about the importance of the media in a free society. Simply put, it would not have been reported on the mainland. In Hong Kong, however, the press corps has been digging out the facts and asking questions of those in charge. But for how much longer can they perform such a role? Hong Kong’s partygate comes at a time when independent news organisations are under sustained attack, with several having already been forced to close.
The Christmas raid on Stand News and the closure of Citizen News is unlikely to be the end of the crackdown. Whatever’s left of the industry might soon have to deal with a “fake news” law that could make criticising the authorities even costlier. In a particularly cruel twist, pro-Beijing newspapers in Hong Kong, some of which are directly owned by China’s liaison office in the city, have become as potent a weapon as the dreaded national security law. A critical article or ferocious editorial in one of these titles can be all it takes to convince an opposition organisation to shut up shop – long before any police raids or evidence of actual wrongdoing. With Chinese New Year only weeks away, there is little mood in Hong Kong to celebrate.