Over the years when my other half or good friends have been in plays in the West End, there is often a nice addition after the curtain call. While most people fall into the darkness to find a spot for supper or push through the giddy melée to catch the last train home, you head behind the theatre, often down some piss-fragranced alley, to the stage door. Here you’ll find the stage doorkeeper, routinely a wise old hand who is a nice mix of bouncer and maître’d depending on whether he or she likes the cut of your jib. You give them your name, explain who is expecting you, and then they call down to the dressing room or announce over the Tannoy your presence.
Then down the stairs you go, impressed at how people who were on stage just minutes before were already streaming past you, job done. The stairwell walls are covered with old theatre bills and photographs of performers stretching back decades. As an outsider, it’s funny to see how the star’s dressing room is no bigger than a cupboard, with a mirror festooned with good-luck cards and perhaps a forlorn little bed. When you got to meet people in this after-show moment, there is often a bonhomie and a quick glass of wine that even included interlopers.
Illustration: Mathieu De Muizon
Twenty and more years ago, when I had more friends who were actors, there was always another group of people installed at the stage door: the autograph-hunters. Now these were not people who had seen the show or cared whether it was a smash or a flop; they were men and women who spent their time just tracking down the stars seeking a signature on a piece of paper to prove that they had met them to capture some of their glow. You would see the same people again and again; they had been at it for years. It made you realise how being around fame warps us, whether me trying to play it cool or that now-gone generation of autograph collectors, who are seen by many as too obsessive for comfort. But those men and women have nothing on us today. Except it’s not autographs that people want now; it’s the picture. And the results of this endless celebrity cataloguing play out in one odd way: when people die.
Within seconds of anyone famous popping their clogs, social media is filled with photos of the dearly departed with the account’s owner. Were they once at the same fundraiser? Appeared on a panel together in 1988? Had a friend who got them backstage at a theatre (gulp)? Whatever the connection, the words always follow the same template: “So saddened to hear about the death of Meat Loaf. I will never forget this moment in Des Moines in 1992. Legend.” Or, “So broken-hearted at the passing of Betty White, who it was my great pleasure to spend some time with – my thoughts are with her family.” Those “moments”, the “time spent”, probably amounted to seconds. But this is the world of the social-media obituary. (Meanwhile what the post should say is, “I forced them to have a picture taken with me; they were uncomfortable about the whole thing. But hey, it’s 2022.”)
What the Insta-obituary writers seek, just like those autograph collectors, is a moment of connection and of fleeting equivalence: “Look, here we are in the same place, in the same moment.” So I guess it’s all innocent and fine except, well, it’s not. These posters are a kind of fantasist, out to warp the narrative, to – like Woody Allen’s character in the film Zelig – insert themselves into the story.
We live in a time when memories are rarely enough (and I know this affects me too). But even if we now have those pictures of extraordinary people on our phones, of seconds spent in the company of our heroes, perhaps that’s where they should stay, because once thrown out there, their potency ebbs and you risk looking a little seedy. And the Insta-obit is more about the person posting it than the dead. Although, would you like to see the picture of me and Meat Loaf? Because, really, wow, what a day that was!