The Royal Institute of British Architects (Riba) has called for a retrofit of 3.3 million homes that were built in the UK between the 1920s and 1940s. The aim is to reduce the environmental footprint of these almost 100-year-old structures by improving their insulation, windows and boilers. According to Riba, the process could cut the nation’s overall carbon emissions by 4 per cent.
But it’s not the only reason that the call should be embraced by Whitehall. The interwar period might be celebrated for its art deco buildings and for paving the way for modernist works but its everyday architecture also had some outstanding examples. Many of them are two-storey townhouses, which are perfect for compact urban living. They were constructed at a time when housing standards were improving, quality materials were de rigueur and minimum-space requirements were introduced, creating homes that are cosy but not small.
The motion from the institute, then, is about much more than environmental impact. It’s also about preserving good architecture that already serves everyday people and reducing the temptation for owners and developers to pull the houses down in favour of newer – and no doubt cheaper – builds.
If the government follows the advice, the net result would not only see improvements to the climate but also the maintenance of characterful, quality homes. And it might even tempt other countries and cities to follow suit.
In my hometown of Perth, where beautiful 1930s bungalows are regularly torn down to be replaced by characterless suburban homes, such a move would be appreciated. All the more reason for me to hope that the institute is listened to.