Opinion / Josh Fehnert
Matter of trust
Journalists can be rather grandiose. At their loftiest, some dub their scribbles “the first draft of history”, claim that they’re speaking “truth to power” or wang on about Watergate. In the real world the reputation of the fourth estate has been bruised by funding cuts, fake news and misjudged revenue models. Meanwhile, as the availability of information increases, the need for a trustworthy read on the world has never been more pressing.
This struck me afresh as I looked at Monocle’s report on Nato’s Cold Response exercise, recently held in Norway and documented in the May issue of Monocle, which is out today. Planned before Russia’s invasion of Ukraine, the exercise involved drilling 30,000 troops from 27 countries. Those taking part spoke of Nato’s aims with a radical candour – an openness reflected in the access we were granted. A similar transparency can be glimpsed in the way in which the UK and US have trailed military intelligence about false-flag operations and Russian advances to outflank, forewarn and fight the advance of disinformation.
Elsewhere in this issue we hear from a former producer at the Kremlin-backed broadcaster RT. They recall sourcing clickbait and “silly stories” to offset the overtly pro-Putin news agenda and note dysfunctional working practices, propaganda and calls by senior staff to “create” rather than report stories. This seedy, closed-off world is a galling glimpse at what could happen to journalism – and its high-minded aims – if left unprotected.
While not every article can fell a president, win a war or unpick all the knottiest problems of modern life, stories can create a better-informed, opportunity-oriented and even optimistic world with narratives that nudge us in a better direction. For more of those, plus Monocle’s annual Design Awards and dispatches from around the world, pick up a copy of the May issue or support our journalism by subscribing today.