Opinion / Michael Booth
Talking points
There was some unexpectedly lively debate in Copenhagen last week at the Obel Award Talks, a series of lectures and roundtables arranged as part of the UIA World Congress of Architects. The discussions explored some of the existential threats facing humanity and their potential architectural solutions, and ranged from Nairobi-based Cave_bureau on the merits of burying cable networks to talks about wellbeing featuring Junya Ishigami, winner of the inaugural Obel in 2019 for his Mizuniwa water garden.
The most active sessions took place during an innocuous-sounding “architecture as mending” panel, at which MacArthur Genius Grant-winner Jeanne Gang discussed cleaning up US industrial river sites. Xu Tiantian also spoke about projects in rural Chinese communities, while the 2020 Obel Award-winner, Anna Heringer, made an emotional apology on behalf of the Global North to the South for “colonising” the idea of the dream home.
Another panellist, Reinier de Graaf (pictured, on far left) of Dutch firm OMA, perhaps failed to read the room. He called out the industry for its “excessive demonstrations of virtue” and what he considered to be self-congratulatory greenwashing. Then he went on to dismiss the “fetishising” of small-scale projects, saying, “Being a catalyst is not enough.” He also compared local starchitect Bjarke Ingels to Michael Jackson for his messianic posturing and produced a photo of the UN’s face of sustainable architecture boarding a private jet. “The word ‘sustainability’ should be banned – it has become so corrupted as to be meaningless,” said De Graaf, before taking a pop at architectural awards that were given to “business-as-usual buildings”.
This year’s prizes will be given out in October in Sydney. De Graaf might or might not be welcome but – like it or not – his straight-talking is exactly what the industry needs.
Michael Booth is Monocle’s Copenhagen correspondent. For more opinion, analysis and insight, subscribe to Monocle today.