It’s a mid-autumn Saturday morning and I’m staying with my mother in Toronto. The usual drill when I visit is a round of morning coffee, plotting out the day, getting dressed for a little trot around the Bloor West Village district and maybe just one more coffee before heading out the door. In the background there’s the dull rumble of the subway crossing the bridge below and the GE clock radio in the kitchen (still going strong after 40 years of service) is tuned to the national broadcaster, CBC. At the top of the hour, as shoelaces are tied and essentials stuffed in pockets, I drift closer to the kitchen to catch the headlines and linger a little to hear what’s coming up next.
The news on this particular morning starts in Gaza, there’s a clip from Kamala Harris on the campaign trail, some stats from a government study and some iffy weather in British Columbia. The news is followed by a promo or two and then I’m welcomed to a programme which I believe is about life in and around Ontario but the presenter and script is a complete downer. Like many state broadcasters, the CBC’s tone is generally earnest and programmes are well produced but over the span of ten minutes I’m struck by how negative the delivery and stories are. No sunny weekend listening here, it’s all struggle, soul searching and looking backward. I eventually make my way out the door and hit the street. I pass couples in athleisure chattering away, there are plenty of dog-walkers and joggers darting in and out of Etienne Brûlé Park (a relative who supposedly came across this stretch of Canada centuries ago) and the mood is considerably sunnier in this leafy patch of Toronto than it is on the CBC.
Or is it? No one seems particularly happy with prime minister Justin Trudeau (“He’s one misstep from being booted out or stepping down,” I’m told repeatedly), the crime story of the day is about tow-truck gangs and a surge in stolen vehicles, there’s a housing crisis, there are homeless people defecating on sidewalks, public schools are a shambles, infrastructure is not keeping up with the rising population – but the good news is that the Taylor Swift tour is proving to be a boost for Toronto’s hospitality sector.
Just before Christmas a friend in Ottawa dropped me a note. The headline: “Fancy coming home?” The message suggested that Trudeau would soon be out and it was time to spend part of my holiday break thinking about the mother country. And I did. A lot. Then this week, just as my friend had hinted, the breaking-news banners started popping up on screen, mics and a lectern were put in place in Ottawa and Trudeau was out. And, as is so often the case with Canada, the country’s moment in the global spotlight was quickly eclipsed by the fires sweeping across parts of Los Angeles County.
While the Liberal Party needs to choose a new leader – and the nation will soon need to choose a prime minister – Canadians also need to decide who they want to be and fast. What was once a young, energetic nation, is now well out of its awkward, formative years and must get on with the very urgent business of establishing itself as a confident, dependable and connected nation that spans a sizeable patch at the top of the world. For the past few years I’ve been questioning whether Canada is even a nation so much as a platform – albeit a rather huge one. It’s a place where great ideas and products are launched but then the founders move elsewhere, where talented artists build careers but move to Nashville and LA, where people arrive from abroad but don’t participate because it has somehow become taboo to promote any sense of what it means to be a nation. Indeed, how can you become a player when there are no rules and the playing field is so massive?
The Canadian cultural mosaic that I grew up in was a place where all the kids in my fourth-grade class could celebrate their heritage by wearing costumes, bringing in national dishes and singing songs in Czech and Cantonese when we had our “World Day” in the middle of winter. We would ask Christopher questions about life in Sri Lanka, Peter would talk about his family’s village back in Portugal, Pat would serve up tasty treats from Greece and watch Beate do little twirls in her dirndl (she was delivered to the school gates by a driver in a long-wheelbase Merc). All of this was bookended by us standing beside our desks and belting out the national anthem first thing in the morning (Jehovah’s Witnesses were excused), while the day closed with us singing “God Save the Queen”. In grade six we had PR visits from the Royal Canadian Mounted Police, who explained how to look sharp in a red jacket and knee-high boots, and in junior-high school we were offered the chance to become naval cadets if we felt that a career on a clapped-out Canadian destroyer might be our calling. Did all of this make me feel part of something bigger? Did I feel proud to be Canadian? Very much so. If this was all a 1970s experiment in engineering social capital, it worked. I don’t think the same could be said today. That mosaic has now turned to mush.
Many ethnic communities are disconnected (physically, economically, culturally) from daily life in Toronto, Halifax and Calgary; and why should you participate when you can write your driver’s licence test in more than 30 languages in a country with only two official tongues? It’s not exactly an exercise that encourages people to integrate and contribute to building a stronger nation. Many will argue that such a policy is all part of Canada’s “welcoming nature” but I’d venture that it’s precisely this type of behaviour in officialdom that has created a baggy, anything goes, “let’s not dare have a point of view” climate that has left millions bewildered, frustrated and disillusioned.
Canada’s next leader needs to take some swift decisions and act. The justice system needs to tighten up, immigration requires tougher barriers for entry (it’s not just about welcoming tech talent but also admitting people who will contribute and behave in their new home), train lines need to be built, thoughtless urban sprawl needs to stop and Canada needs to get serious about spending on defence and diplomacy – it’s time to build architecturally impressive embassies rather than shuttering them, and to make a career in security or the foreign service attractive. Most importantly, Canada’s next leader needs to be globally connected, curious about the world, have a firm grip on the finer points of running a business and be open to resetting relations with Tokyo, Paris and Canberra – while playing along with whatever winds its way up from Palm Beach.