The UK government is falling woefully short of its house-building targets, which recently hit the lowest level in almost a decade despite cross-party urgency. The country needs new homes – about 1.5 million over the next five years. How to get them is less clear-cut as borrowing costs soar, consumer confidence slumps and materials and labour remain expensive.
The UK isn’t alone in its housing struggle and the problem is, well, building. According to UN-Habitat, the world needs to create 96,000 affordable homes every day to accommodate the three billion people who will need access to adequate housing by 2030. And that’s before I push you, dear reader, to imagine a world where architecture, planning and engineering might conspire to create something more than merely “adequate”. What happened to thinking of buildings in terms of beauty, scale and what they can offer residents, rather than just as shelter?
Steps to success: Forskaren in Stockholm
Image: Felix Odell, Nic Lehoux
Buildings should be constructive, adding value to residents’ lives as well as to the firms behind them. Sadly, even cutting-edge developments, ambitious new neighbourhoods and loudly touted infrastructure projects can lose their lustre when the hoardings fall and ideas are exposed to the complexities and mess of ever-changing urban life. Bright renders can quickly give way to windswept, overcast reality.
Luckily, Monocle’s sunny, out-now March issue might offer a glimpse of what firmer foundations for a better-built world might look like. In our perfectly proportioned Property Survey, we report from Tempe, Arizona, where a car-free development shows life beyond the brochure and residents are more important than roads. Surely an avenue worth considering? As is creating streets that connect communities and promote interactions on a human scale.
In bloom: Carmichael Residences in Mumbai by Skidmore, Owings & Merrill
Image: Felix Odell, Nic Lehoux
A bigger splash: New swimming pool in New Westminster, Canada
Image: Felix Odell, Nic Lehoux
There are other questions to ask about the sort of structures flying up in Singapore, San Francisco and beyond. Do people ever really feel at home in tall towers? What do we risk by hastily building over green spaces or near flood plains to hit targets? What sorts of houses, offices and areas tend to last and charm people for generations? There might be some penthouse apartments in the mix but most homes need some connection with the street below. Victorian terraces, lemon-hued Haussmannian blocks and New York brownstones still seem better on scale and charm than characterless blocks of glass and steel. As methods of manufacturing sustainable materials improve, we still have lessons to learn about turning houses into homes that will appeal for generations.
As well as big interviews, global reporting and long reads, the latest print edition, like a thought-through development, also offers a view: that buildings and the spaces between them can shape lives and forge communities. So here’s the home truth: twinkly renders are one thing but success in reality can be rather different.
Josh Fehnert is Monocle’s editor. Buy the
March edition
or
subscribe
so that you never miss an issue.