Opinion / Andrew Mueller
In the dock
Australia’s parliament is considering reforming its question time. It’s a parliamentary ritual observed by a few democracies: a fixed spot, usually weekly, in which senior ministers and the prime minister field questions from their fellow parliamentarians, whether friendly or hostile. In the countries that observe question time – Canada, the UK, Japan, New Zealand and Finland, among others – it is generally the case that both politicians and public profess to hate it.
The politicians say – usually by way of rueful admission in their memoirs – that they dislike question time because it is a nerve-wracking ordeal in which one false word could see them beclowned on the evening news and social media. The public claim that they hate question time because it is a raucous, indecorous bear pit. Both are reasons to hope that Australia does not reform question time out of existence.
Politicians should have their wits tested: such a regular going-over makes it much harder for outright duds, dingbats and dunces to get to the top. And publics should see their leaders – and those who would lead them – passionate and partisan in defence of their ideas. Question time may often bring out the worst in politicians but it also, sometimes, brings out the best.