OPENER / ANDREW TUCK
Legacy-makers and lawbreakers
A few years ago at dinner I was sitting next to a property developer who had some major projects in the pipeline that were set to reshape his hometown’s skyline for decades to come. I asked him about the “L” word – legacy – and whether that was a big motivation for him. Did he think about how he could make his city more beautiful? More liveable? Did he think of himself living on through the work he was doing? I promise I was only on my second glass of wine – but I like to know this stuff.
His reply was a little deflating. “To be honest with you,” he said, “the legacy I worry about is making the money to secure the future of my children.” He also suggested that I was a little romantic if I imagined that the average person even noticed the quality of build. “It makes no difference to people if I buy a cheap brick or an expensive brick,” he said. The thing that got me was not the lack of ambition but the ambivalence about making a mark or changing anything for anyone. As we start a new year, that’s the part that I am wondering about.
My parents had me later in life – my dad already 50, my mum 45. One of the many good things about having older parents was that they knew stuff; they knew themselves. My dad, in particular, would have big chats with a little kid. I remember once being scared of the concept of dying. My dad had obviously thought about his own mortality and said that all that mattered in the end was that you passed something on – a skill, an attitude, some of your luck. My dad was a great gardener and me and my sisters all have a bit of his passion for plants. That’s also legacy. And if we can just do something as modest as that we should all be happy. Or, alternatively, get very rich and have a museum wing built in your name. That works too.
Watch it: We live in a new golden age of television where it is impossible to keep up with all the great shows on offer unless you intend to become a permanent couch slob (and then, of course, you would struggle to pay for all your subscriptions). But it’s funny how many people also stray away from, say, the splendour of The Crown or the calculated meanness of Succession to a world of guiltier televisual pleasures. Even when there’s the TV equivalent of a fine-wine cellar, a swig of Baileys might really hit the spot some days.
Personally, I wish there were more shows about architecture – and definitely one about how to make a city (did I mention that I present The Urbanist podcast? Do you need to see my pitch?). But I also find it relaxing at the end of a long day to watch an episode of Police Interceptors or Traffic Cops. In these modest-budget shows you simply go along for the ride with the police as they chase drunk drivers, drug dealers, joyriders and various nefarious sorts. It’s oddly soothing.
Traffic Cops, for example, is simply billed as an “action-packed documentary series following Yorkshire-based law-enforcers”. This is the UK; it isn’t like the US versions, where guns and shootouts might be involved – you’re more likely to see a proverbial wrist being slapped, although your reactionary ire can be provoked at the end of the show when you discover what happened to these baby-faced hoodlums: usually very little. It's ironic, then, that the presenter of another show, Police, Camera, Action!, had to step down after being arrested for drink-driving – twice. If the new year seems a little daunting, enjoy the thrill of a chase for some winter diversion – or perhaps a makeover show would set you up for January better.