Opinion / Christopher Cermak
Poles apart
It’s never easy to draw a line from elections in one part of the world to another – domestic politics and culture inevitably play a bigger role than we, as foreign commentators, care to admit. And yet one can’t help but look at the divisive election result in Poland this weekend as a warning sign for those who might have been spelling the end of populism in the aftermath of this global pandemic.
What seems to have mattered in Poland – at least, for those who voted (narrowly) to re-elect conservative-nationalist president Andrzej Duda (pictured) – was the government’s handling of the economy, complete with programmes for a struggling working class that has felt “heard” by this administration. Such issues were prioritised over the concerns that motivated international observers to watch Poland’s elections closely: Duda’s poor handling of the coronavirus (he resisted health warnings and opened earlier than most); his threats to the independence of the judiciary and media; his view of the LGBT community as an “ideology” not a right.
This should serve as a warning for the progressive-minded: issues that motivate the righteous among us – upholding liberal democracy, equality and protecting minority rights principal among them – are no doubt worth fighting for. But in a battle of ideas it doesn’t help to assume that you’re on the right side of history. Protests, however loud and numerous, can bring much-needed attention to issues but will not always convert voters; they don’t necessarily change the positions of those whose minds were not already open. Activism plays a crucial role but we also can’t forget to seek new ways in which to engage those who disagree; to convince, rather than demonise or silence, the seemingly inconvincible (the “deplorables” in Hillary Clinton’s famous words) in our societies. Let Poland’s election serve as a reminder of that.