Opinion / Christopher Cermak
At any right
We all get this feeling sometimes: that the means, even if illegal or improper, are justified when the cause is just – and unjustified when it isn’t. This has been apparent during the many protests held since the pandemic began. With that in mind here are some common-sense truths that should be agreeable to our readers.
-
Protests and free speech are a right that should never be infringed.
-
Protests in a pandemic carry risks to all of us and should be conducted in line with the prevailing health guidance.
-
Violence is never justified. But nor should sporadic violence by a few detract from the proper cause of the many.
-
Protests have an important place in a democracy but elections must count for something too.
Are we agreed? Great. Now consider these recent examples. Protests in Berlin this weekend (pictured), and in US cities in past months, against the economic impact of coronavirus restrictions, often without masks and including sporadic violence by right-wing agitators. Ongoing Black Lives Matter protests in US cities and elsewhere, often without masks and including sporadic violence by left-wing agitators. Protests in Tel Aviv calling for Benjamin Netanyahu to step down over his pandemic response and corruption allegations, despite three elections held in the past year.
Yes, each case is different, I hear you say. But the question still stands: in which of these cases (and the countless others I didn’t mention from Hong Kong to Zimbabwe to Brazil) did you focus on the “right” to protest and where did you back police responses to quell them? Where did you criticise or downplay the health impact? I suspect your answers differ depending on location and beliefs. But should they? Probably not as much as you think.