Opinion / James Chambers
Popularity contest
Protests are not dead in Hong Kong; they’ve just had to mutate. The latest form of anti-establishment activism is to boycott the government’s plan to test 7.5 million people for coronavirus. The reason? Critics are comparing the public health risks of swabbing everyone to that of organising the legislative elections. Chief executive Carrie Lam delayed the vote for a year amid the city’s third wave of the pandemic. As a result, the voluntary scheme has become a proxy for the elections, which were meant to take place next weekend. Lam hit back this week but, as they say in politics, the optics don’t look good.
Booths will be set up across the city to collect samples (albeit at timed intervals) and government ministers have been campaigning to encourage participation. Most Hong Kongers see little point in mass testing, especially when daily cases are dropping to single digits. Meanwhile, crazed conspiracy theorists fear a campaign by the Chinese Communist party to collect their DNA.
Across the board, Hong Kongers are also dealing with wounded pride. Lam went to the central government in Beijing for help in conducting the mass testing and her public messaging has played up the helplessness of Hong Kong – a tough pill to swallow in a city that is used to sending its expertise and assistance in the opposite direction. The government is likely to “lose” this upcoming pandemic poll in a big way. However, a large public boycott is hardly a big win for the city, especially given that mass vaccinations could be up next.