Opinion / James Chambers
Lights, camera, democracy
In the UK, Prime Minister’s Questions – a live, televised ding-dong between the leader of the government and the leader of the opposition – is staple viewing for political junkies. I must confess that I haven’t watched the BBC Parliament channel since my student days in London. But I strongly support the transparency it brings. Few other democracies can compete with Westminster’s weekly theatrics – and many a foreign leader has been known to count their good fortune for that.
It came as a surprise then that Singapore’s government is paving the way, at least in principle, for parliamentary proceedings to be live-streamed in the Lion City. Prime minister Lee Hsien Loong and the ruling People’s Action Party (PAP) are not known for their love of criticism, so this step towards greater accountability is to be applauded. Yes, viewers in Singapore can already watch parliamentary clips after the fact but there’s nothing like the cut and thrust of live broadcasting to keep politicians on their toes.
Last week’s announcement comes hot on the heels of the summer’s general election. The Workers’ Party, Singapore’s main opposition, made historic gains and reminded the PAP that it’s enduring 61-year majority might not last forever. Lee was moved to address his government’s shortcomings during the pandemic and, in a landmark first for the city-state, he also officially recognised politician Pritam Singh, secretary-general of the Workers’ Party, as leader of the opposition. That post comes with staff support and resources, along with a clear elevation in status: Singaporeans have been captivated this month by news coverage of Singh challenging the government.
The prospect of watching this battle unfold live on screen is bound to boost overall political engagement. But don’t expect Lee to get a Westminster-style, verbal tongue-lashing. This is Singapore, after all, where the government encourages a “sober tone” in all political debates – televised or not.