Opinion / Christopher Cermak
Under attack
Long distracted by the next steps in confronting a pandemic, France was brought down to earth with a thud on Friday. Two people were injured in a knife attack in Paris, near the former headquarters of Charlie Hebdo, the magazine that has published satirical cartoons of the Muslim prophet Mohammed and now operates from a secret location.
Perhaps the most awful aspect of Friday’s attack, for which one person has been arrested and several others are in police custody, is that it was to be expected; while it wasn’t planned like the far more devastating attack on the magazine’s headquarters back in 2015 that killed 12 people, it came at the start of a trial of 14 accomplices of that initial incident. It also came shortly after the offending cartoons were republished by Charlie Hebdo in an act of defiance.
While there are legitimate questions about the appropriateness of Charlie Hebdo’s decision to republish cartoons that are offensive to France’s Muslim minority – and Muslims around the world – there should be no question about its legal right to do so. Nor, obviously, should resorting to violence ever be the answer. And yet Friday’s incident feels part of a broader, dangerous pattern.
It’s no understatement to say that freedom of the press is under attack from all corners. Donald Trump and his supporters consistently undermine what they call the “fake news media”, going so far as to question whether certain outlets should have their operating licences revoked; autocrats in many other countries feel emboldened to do the same. On the other end of the spectrum, the “cancel culture” that forces writers to shy away from expressing their views can seem equally out of sync with a western society that values the right to freedom of speech. Charlie Hebdo should make all sides stop and think about whether silencing journalists for expressing their views is ever really the answer.