Opinion / Nic Monisse
Corridors of power
Architecture has long been used as a tool to communicate the intentions of political regimes. From the 14th-century frescoes depicting good governance in Siena’s parliament building to Australia where, until recently, its government showed the power of the people by allowing citizens to walk onto the roof of parliament.
So when Egyptian president Abdel Fattah el-Sisi (pictured) announced in 2015 that he would be moving the country’s political centre to a new location, 40km east of Cairo, optimists hoped that the government might physically build in a representation of a more stable and open country. Its new government structures could be forward-thinking and transparent, with generous, public-facing windows into parliamentary chambers and seating that forces partisan groups to sit in arrangements that might promote collaboration. But a recent announcement from Sisi that all architectural designs of the new administrative capital will reflect the “richness and greatness of Egypt’s past” means that such an approach is unlikely.
Reading between the lines, it seems that the new capital’s buildings will be monumental, be classical in form, and exude power by using solid materials that lack any visible or physical transparency. Such an approach recalls Donald Trump’s mandate that new federal buildings could only be neoclassical in style – a misplaced edict that was undone by Joe Biden earlier this year. For Sisi it’s also a missed opportunity to present a better face to the world and for the people of Egypt to finally have a government that might better represent their democratic desire.