Opinion / Megan Gibson
Difficult diagnosis
Have the results of a much-anticipated investigation ever been so unsurprising? When the World Health Organization (WHO) yesterday released its report – written by 17 scientists selected by the WHO and 17 Chinese scientists – on the origins of coronavirus, it was about as anticlimactic as another lockdown. Considering that the Chinese authorities’ severe restrictions on the WHO investigators’ fact-finding mission to Wuhan have been widely reported for months, the likelihood that the subsequent findings would offer any real insight into the outbreak was miniscule. Instead, the report confirms that little is still known about the initial spread of the virus and dismisses the possibility of it originating in a lab as “unlikely”.
Although the report isn’t surprising, it is a cause for concern. Governments around the world are now calling for more multilateral co-operation to prevent future pandemics (24 leaders jointly issued a call for a global treaty in newspaper editorials published yesterday). But the current set-up of existing multilateral organisations – specifically the WHO – demonstrates the hurdles to such an endeavour. For governments to work together in earnest, each must come to the table in good faith. If one nation undermines the whole effort via a lack of transparency, or it obscures the truth for political gain while facing little consequence, everyone suffers.
Many believe that the WHO report demonstrates that Beijing isn’t acting in good faith. Other nations need to push back on China – for transparency, information and co-operation – if there’s going to be any real hope that countries can effectively work together on preventing another pandemic further down the line.