Opinion / Christopher Cermak
Lessons learnt
Can political leaders change their stripes? As citizens and observers we often say we want politicians to admit their mistakes. Yet when they do we tend to dismiss their motives or be unforgiving of the bad decisions they took in the first place. It’s a topic that has irked me thanks to a few choice examples from the news this week.
Markus Söder: The state premier of Bavaria has conceded defeat to Armin Laschet in a race to lead Germany’s ruling conservatives into September’s post-Merkel federal elections. The reason? Söder probably ruffled too many feathers among Germany’s political elite, including Angela Merkel herself, after taking a hard anti-immigration line in the refugee crisis of 2015 and 2016. He’s sought to change his image since, becoming an environmentalist, a competent pandemic manager and one of Germany’s most popular politicians. He has four years to prove that this new image isn’t just for show.
George W Bush: The former US president has released a new book of his own artistic portraits of America’s immigrants. The Guardian ran with: “George W Bush is back – but not all appreciate his new progressive image.” Frankly, that’s lazy headline writing: everyone loves to hate Bush but why not give him a chance? Before the war on terror there was compassionate conservatism, a comprehensive immigration bill and a belief that Hispanics were the future of the Republican party. Bush is going back to his roots.
Tony Blair: As an American studying in the UK at the time of the Iraq war, my worldview was partly shaped by Blair (pictured). And though his apologies since then have rung hollow for many in the UK, I respected Blair as someone who firmly believed that, when it came to the US, it was better to try and shape policy than be on the outside looking in. In my interview with him for Monocle’s April issue, he suggested that the same principle would have guided his dealings with Donald Trump, particularly when it came to the pandemic.
Personally I prefer leaders who make bad decisions but with good intentions than those with bad intentions in the first place. The former group are also the ones most likely to admit mistakes and make up for them later in life. And surely that’s a trait among politicians that’s worth encouraging.