Opinion / Christopher Cermak
Time for action
My first experience of covering a climate summit was in December 2010 in Cancún, Mexico. That gathering was meant to be the big follow-up to Copenhagen, a highly-touted summit in 2009 that wound up failing rather spectacularly. By contrast, Cancún was considered a success. After two days of marathon negotiations that lasted into the early hours, a deal was agreed to by all countries except Bolivia. It then took another five years for the Paris climate accords to be brokered in 2015.
I remember being struck by the passion in Cancún: the halls were filled with climate activists; representatives of small island states, in particular, were urging more aggressive action. When a deal was finally reached, it was celebrated – even if it was hardly as ambitious as many on the ground had hoped for. Fast-forward another 11 years and that passion, like many things in our politics these days, has turned to restlessness. Climate activists have been blocking highways in the UK in the run-up to the Cop26 climate summit in Glasgow, which begins on Sunday, and scientists and the UN are issuing increasingly dire warnings that this is the last chance for humanity to act.
I often find myself writing columns about the merits of compromise rather than sticking stubbornly to extreme points of view. In that vein, watching a small cohort of activists glue themselves to roads feels counter-productive and unlikely to get the average member of the commuting public on side. That said, it’s true that the climate crisis demands more urgency than the platitudes about determined action that I heard more than a decade ago in Cancún. My sense is that things are truly different this time around; indeed, it feels as though much of society is now moving faster than the politicians. Businesses and manufacturers are busy retooling to cater to consumer demand. The shift in public consciousness has already happened on climate change; it’s time for global leaders to close the deal.