Opinion / Andrew Tuck
All creatures, great and small
This week, Pope Francis (pictured) returned to a topic that has been getting his goat – and puppy and kitten – for some time: people who, instead of procreating, are choosing to lavish time on pets. Clearly he’s ignoring the fact that Catholic priests, officially at least, are hardly helping with the baby-production business. During his weekly audience at the Vatican, the pontiff declared, “Today we see a form of selfishness. We see some people that do not want to have a child. Sometimes they have one and that’s it. But they have dogs and cats that take the place of children.”
Last night as I laid the special miniature dinner table at which Macy, my fox terrier, has her supper, I wondered who on Earth he could mean (although I admit there was not much time to worry at that exact moment, what with affixing the tiara to Macy’s head and selecting some soothing dining music – Bach, naturally – to ease her into her evening). But seeing as I am gay, it might be that I get special dispensation here as I am sure the pope would rather I cut down on anything akin to procreating and actually did pat the puppy (not a euphemism) instead.
It’s unlikely that the pope’s words will dent anyone’s affection for their pets. The truth is that caring for an animal is not selfish and, for all sorts of people, the presence of one in their life is a transformational experience. Plus, having a child does not mean that one automatically becomes a selfless being (crikey, he should come and hang out with the feisty parents I know). Personally, I think it’s time that Pope Francis got himself a cavapoo or a cockerdoo. I am sure he would feel more relaxed in seconds. Macy agrees; we are going to send him a letter on her headed notepaper.