01
On Thursday, just before 04.00 in London, my phone started pinging with news notifications. I looked at the screen: Russia’s invasion of Ukraine had begun. I lay there in the dark, unease spreading with every update. Over in Los Angeles, Christopher Lord, our Americas editor, was using the time difference to our advantage to line up Ukraine specialists and people in the country for Monocle 24’s morning radio show that airs from London, The Globalist. Just after 06.00 I phoned Bill Whitehouse from our digital team and told him to cancel The Monocle Minute newsletter sendout: the world had changed since it was filed just a few hours before; it needed to be redone.
And then the day barrelled on: images flashing on the office’s TV screens; news breaking on my phone. At midday I walked down to the studios to listen to Andrew Mueller hosting The Briefing. I sat in the dark of the control room and listened as one guest after another set out the potential scenarios – all of them bleak.
Across the day, as the TV news carried live feeds of Jens Stoltenberg, Boris Johnson or Joe Biden, the volume would be ratcheted up and people would gather to hear what these men thought could be done. It sounded like a few Russians would have to cancel the summer holiday in London and perhaps the yacht order would have to wait a bit – but it was hard to imagine Vladimir Putin breaking a sweat over any of this chatter.
Imbibing too much rolling news can often make you feel as though you might lose your footing. But the response engendered by the invasion of Ukraine by a tyrant – the attempt by Russia to trample over an independent nation’s prized democracy, the squandering of life, the inability of the West to respond – is about more than news anxiety. This isn’t going to be some painful regional reset, such as the abandoning of Afghanistan this year, nor a brutal war such as Syria’s, the repercussions of which can be lived with because their effects are unlikely to change your day. No, this is an event that, as we are quickly realising, resets the world order; it puts in place existential threats for all of us. It is a moment when it is OK to fear; even to feel despair.
02
Yet. In the evening our executive editor Nolan Giles and I took our new fashion editor, Natalie Theodosi, for a drink (she started on Monday and I had barely said “hello” all week). We went to a nearby hotel and it was packed – not even a space to stand at the bar. We were about to leave when I spotted someone I know who works there and he kindly found us a perch. At the neighbouring tables there were people from all over the world having a blast: smartly dressed Emirati boys on one side of us, a group of partying French on the other. Was I getting this out of proportion? Was the world just as it had been a week or a month ago? Or had my neighbours been dosed up with so much anxiety over the past two years that the invasion of Ukraine was not going to spoil their mood now? Did we just have different techniques for dealing with this age of anxiety?
03
Do you think it would be possible for TV shows to carry trigger warnings about the fact that they, well, carry trigger warnings? There are lots of things that cause me alarm – films that don’t have Timothée Chalamet in them, for example. But we did this clever thing: we bought a TV with an off button. Honestly, it’s incredible – you just press it and the TV stops working. The trouble with the current trigger-warning rash is that there’s nothing that won’t upset someone. I read the other day about a person triggered by hearing English women speak (sorry, Judi Dench, that’s the end of your career). So where do you stop? Can’t we allow people to be a little bit offended just sometimes? To move on if they don’t like what they see? When you have kids cowering in Kyiv for fear of being blown up, fear of men with real triggers, isn’t it a bit sick trying to filter out every pollen-grain of difficulty from the world around us? Shouldn’t we accept that the world can be upsetting?
04
And if you like your art world free of triggering connections and potentially suspect patrons, then do not go to the wonderful Museu Fundación Juan March in Palma de Mallorca. I was in Palma last weekend and came upon the glorious building – free entry too – and its art (a Miró here, a Dalí there). I wondered who March was and so looked him up after my visit. Turns out he was the son of a pig farmer who ended up becoming Spain’s richest man and the world’s sixth wealthiest. He was sent to jail for his dodgy business deals, backed Franco and smuggled arms. But today his wealthy descendants oversee his amazing foundation and one of Spain’s great art collections. They seem more at ease with the odd personality dent in Spain; even a bit of what Anglo-folk might call “art-washing”. Hell, they liked March so much they even named a lizard after him – that’s an algyroides marchi about to nibble your toe.