Opinion / Markus Hippi
Learning from history
For my generation, growing up in Finland meant growing up with the memory of the Second World War and the fight against the Soviet Union. I got used to listening to my grandfather’s stories of what he saw on the front line and my grandmother’s unending longing for her childhood home, which was lost to the wrong side of the new border when the war ended.
The decades that followed the war were defined by a fear of Russia. The main goal of those in power in Helsinki was to guarantee the peace and security of our land and people. Decisions revolved around how Moscow would feel about them. At times the repeated mantra of an eternal Finnish-Soviet friendship resembled a form of group psychosis.
The fall of the Soviet Union and Finland’s EU membership in 1994 began to change the dynamics. My country felt more independent and proud as its gaze shifted to the West. It became more international and began to see its relationship with Russia as an asset. Surely Finland would understand Moscow better than most other countries, thanks to its close contacts? The idea of Nato membership felt unnecessary as it would only cause tensions.
This year has changed everything. The Finnish people have taken Russia’s invasion of Ukraine personally. Yesterday the country’s parliament gave its overwhelming approval for its Nato application and foreign minister Pekka Haavisto (pictured) signed a petition for membership. The extraordinary support makes clear just how fundamentally the way in which we see our place next to Russia and in the world has changed. We don’t know what the future holds, except that, if we become Nato members, we won’t be alone again if history repeats itself.