Opinion / Ed Stocker
Age of reason
There’s a weary saying in Italy: “You’re paying money towards a state pension? Don’t count on seeing much of it.” The Bel Paese might have the oldest population in an old continent but it isn’t the only country that’s contending with the issue of how to manage an ageing citizenry. France is trying to future-proof its own pension system but its attempts aren’t going down well. Emmanuel Macron argues that the nation has no choice but to raise its retirement age from 62 to 64. Many, however, disagree; protesters from across the political spectrum are taking to the streets to defend their right to call it a day.
On paper it might seem like a no-brainer. People are living longer and too few taxpayers are entering the workforce. But it’s not as simple as that: opponents of Macron’s proposed reforms argue that raising the age ceiling disproportionately affects poorer, less-educated people who enter the labour market earlier and often do more physically demanding tasks – and it’s they who will end up working longer. French lawmakers have partially conceded on this point, saying that people who begin employment between the ages of 20 and 21 will be eligible for a pension after 43 years of work.
Macron, who was elected for a second term last year, might be tempted simply to push through this unpopular legislation now that he has less to lose; the issue almost brought him down during his first term. But government attempts to strongarm reform are unlikely to work. Many other European countries will need to clear similar hurdles in the coming years; Macron has a chance to set a precedent by dealing with the issue through negotiation and compromise rather than by enforcing change. The state retirement age must be dealt with maturely if Macron’s mooted reforms stand a chance of growing old gracefully.
Ed Stocker is Monocle’s Europe editor at large, based in Milan.