Opinion / Petri Burtsoff
Joining the fray
It was momentous for me and many Finns to watch our flag hoisted over the Nato HQ in Brussels this week as our country became the 31st member of the alliance. But it’s hard to explain to people outside Finland just how strong our sense of being left alone to fend off Russia during the Second World War still is and how Russia’s menace has guided the country’s defence thinking ever since.
To me, it felt all the more personal for two reasons. First, my family lost everything it had – their homes, their cattle, many even their lives – to Soviet aggression in 1939. The village where my grandfather was born in Finnish Karelia was annexed by the Soviet Union and has remained in Russian hands ever since.
Perhaps because this trauma runs in the family, I’ve been a fervent and lifelong supporter of Finnish Nato membership. For decades this meant being branded a “warmonger”, as a great majority of Finns believed that staying outside military alliances offered the strongest guarantee for Finland’s territorial integrity. That all changed after Russia’s invasion of Ukraine and today most of the population is rejoicing in the knowledge that we will never fight alone.
But such is the magnitude of this paradigm shift in the Finnish defence doctrine that when the honeymoon period is over, we Finns will need to face an uneasy reality. Will Finland allow Nato soldiers to be stationed near the border, inevitably provoking the Russians? Moreover, aren’t Finnish soldiers now responsible for defending all of Nato’s 31 member states, as opposed to just their own territory?
If – many say when – a wider territorial conflict in Europe erupts, Finnish soldiers will be sent abroad to fight. This is something that we need to learn to live with as Nato members. Having powerful allies gives us protection but also grave new responsibilities.
Petri Burtsoff is Monocle’s Helsinki correspondent. For more opinion, analysis and insight, subscribe to Monocle today.