Opinion / Amy Van Den Berg
Heated debate
While the world watched wildfires rage across Canada this month, questions hovered in the smoky air: are these the effects of climate change? Is this the future of Canadian summers? As the number of fires climbed into the hundreds, Environment Canada issued air-quality warnings across the country. The smoke has now reached as far as northern Europe. Despite being the nation’s worst wildfire season to date, it has unfortunately failed to attract the political discussion it deserves. This week parliament will meet for the last time before the summer break. If the recent cyclical and insipid political exchanges are any indication, Canadians are further away than ever from achieving an effective policy that will prevent future fires.
The Conservatives, led by Pierre Poilievre, have homed in on economic concerns surrounding inflation and housing costs. Their aim is to pressurise the Liberals into cutting federal spending and delivering a balanced budget plan. Justin Trudeau has used the disaster to justify his party’s carbon-tax policy, drawing ire and mistrust from the right and continuing a debate that has circulated throughout the House of Commons for the better part of 15 years.
To be fair, the government doesn’t have a completely hands-off approach: it has expanded its federal assistance programme and increased funding to fight fires across the country, including a “Wildfire Resilient Futures Initiative” with a proposed investment of CA$284m (€196m). This is an adaptive, not preventative, approach which is important, but more is needed.
With the smoke drifting towards the American Midwest and even further afield across the Atlantic, the worst may already be over. But the wildfire season is only beginning and with the country’s leaders caught up in the tangle of a self-serving debate, many burning questions on its future remain unanswered.
Amy Van Den Berg is Monocle Books deputy editor. For more opinion, analysis and insight, subscribe to Monocle today.