Opener / Andrew Tuck
A home for all
It’s funny how often it feels like city fixes ignore entire swathes of residents. As we report today, the UK is encouraging co-living as a way of bypassing its housing shortage. “Co-living”, for the uninitiated, is like WeWork for your private life, where you accept shared kitchens and living spaces in return, hopefully, for a perch that’s not in the suburbs. And, look, it can work – Monocle has previously written warmly about Zürich’s successful schemes. However, if you are not single, under 30 and childless – or just don’t like people stealing your oat milk – then these projects are rarely a solution.
We’ve noticed the same tendency with mobility. When we went to LA CoMotion in Los Angeles, an event that looks at the future of transport, the attendant brands were pushing electric skateboards and endless scooters as their city-mobility solutions. Fun but kind of useless when you need to get your kids home, or your shopping if it’s more extensive than a bagel. Where, we wondered, were all the souped-up golf buggies and mobility rides suitable for the old, infirm and poor-of-balance?
There’s a creeping feeling that a San Francisco take on urban living is now being touted everywhere. We need to pause and ensure that we are providing city solutions that work for every citizen – because co-living too often feels like a youthful rite of passage that, after a year, leaves people lusting after a one-bed apartment and fewer boozy nights.