Opinion / Junichi Toyofuku
Delayed reactor
Today marks the 10th anniversary of the Great East Japan Earthquake and the Japanese media has been giving it extensive coverage. The airwaves have been filled with interviews of brave survivors telling their stories and reminding us that it could happen again. Just last month, a 7.3 magnitude earthquake with its epicentre off the coast of Fukushima (that was felt as far away as Tokyo) turned out to be an aftershock from 2011.
The 2011 natural disaster claimed the lives of at least 15,900 people with another 2,500 missing, while contamination from the Fukushima Daiichi nuclear power plant affected an area almost half the size of Tokyo, which remains off limits to this day. A decade on, I sometimes wonder if Japan has really moved forward. Sure, there has been plenty of academic research on the subject, an epic sea wall is being built and the government has been trying to revive the Tohoku region, promoting tourism, agriculture and fishing. But have we faced the fundamental issue of how we generate energy?
In the immediate aftermath, the Japanese public believed that the earthquake had changed society and that Japan would move into a new future using renewable energy. It hasn’t. While only four nuclear reactors are active today (another 29 currently remain idle), the government continues to keep nuclear energy as an option, despite vocal public opposition. Some members of the ruling Liberal Democratic Party are calling for reactors to be restarted and even propose building new ones. This is partly to help prime minister Yoshihide Suga meet his pledge, announced last autumn, for Japan to become carbon-neutral by 2050. But confronting global climate change can and should happen without putting nations at risk. It’s time to end this debate and say sayonara to nuclear energy in Japan – after all, it’s been 10 years.