Opinion / Megan Gibson
Duty bound
It’s an idea that the Paris-based OECD has been pushing for some time: US treasury secretary Janet Yellen (pictured) announced on Monday that she is working with G20 countries to create a global minimum tax rate for corporations. If implemented, it would mark a seismic shift in global tax policy; Yellen argues that it would counter the “race to the bottom” that has been underway for decades, whereby nations try to attract businesses by offering ever-lower corporate rates within their borders.
Yellen’s announcement is partly motivated by domestic politics. It would give an immediate boost to Joe Biden, whose recently announced $2.25trn (€1.9trn) “build back better” infrastructure plan will need to be properly funded. The president has proposed raising US tax rates, which would place higher burdens on American companies’ foreign profits. A global tax rate would mean that such a move doesn’t put the US at an immediate and significant disadvantage.
On the face of it, a global minimum tax rate would be unpalatable to most traditional conservatives. But such a proposal, if adequately achieved and properly upheld (two big caveats), could actually work to address the problems that have spurred populist movements around the world. That includes Donald Trump’s working-class base, which has felt left behind by the economic benefits others have enjoyed via globalisation. And, by disincentivising technology giants and major multinational corporations from shifting their profits abroad, it could also address the grotesque inequalities in corporate taxation that harm small businesses.
It’s not just US conservatives that would need convincing, though: from business-friendly Ireland to post-Brexit Britain, setting a minimum global corporate tax rate is sure to face heavy opposition. But with globalisation under threat from all sides, it’s a worthwhile discussion to have.