Opinion / Megan Gibson
Change of heart
Did you hear the news? Damascus is now safe. So says Denmark, anyway, which in 2019 deemed the Syrian capital secure enough to return to and in recent weeks has begun revoking a number of residency permits previously granted to refugees. The decision came as a surprise to the refugees whose lives are now once again being upended – especially those who are now being told they no longer have the right to stay in Denmark. It’s also a surprise to officials across the EU, human rights groups and journalists who’ve been covering the Syrian war for a decade.
Six years ago, I was reporting on the border between Austria and Hungary as waves of refugees – the majority of them from Syria – made their way to western and northern European nations in search of a safe chance to rebuild their lives. In interview after interview, Syrians told me that they had seen their neighbourhoods bombed, their friends and family killed and their lives crumble. But almost every one of them also said that they would have done anything to stay if it had been safe to do so.
Government ministers in Copenhagen who are trying to court right-wing votes with anti-immigration policies have defended the decision by saying that the asylum extended to Syrians was always temporary. While it’s fair for nations to adjust their policies on asylum in line with shifting world events and the ebb and flow of geopolitics, Denmark’s decision flies in the face of reality. Both the EU and human rights groups have pointed out that returnees to Syria are at risk of being arrested, tortured and even killed by the regime. Though it might be true that Bashar al-Assad’s forces have control of Damascus and that fighting in the city has ceased, there is plenty of evidence to suggest that the region is not safe – especially for those who once fled.