Opinion / Nic Monisse
Points of view
If you, like me, have ever borne witness to an argument between neighbours, you’ll know that things can get ugly. Once, on my street, an additional storey was added to a home that overlooked a neighbour’s backyard and hot tub (whose occupants were known to skinny dip), while also blocking their idyllic view. The result was naked aggression from the neighbour (read: hot-tubber) who was having their view obstructed and, sadly for them, a failed appeal to block the extension.
Former Montréal mayor Denis Coderre seems less afraid of a fight, and is in danger of riling everyone from neighbours to architects and opposition politicians. Coderre has announced that, if re-elected later this year (he lost the top job in 2017), the city’s sacred 232.5 metre limit on the height of a building would be scrapped to pave the way for even taller buildings. Almost everyone in the city is outraged at the plan. This is partly due to the fact that it wouldn’t achieve Coderre’s desired effect of increasing density. Building codes mean that tall skyscrapers often have a glut of lifeless, empty space at their base, while smaller buildings are often able to comfortably pack more people in – and promote a more vibrant street life.
Anger also swirls around the fact that the legislation change might open the door for developers to create buildings that fundamentally alter the city’s character. Views to Mount Royal’s peak – one of the initial reasons for the cap – have come to define living in Québec’s largest city. Backlash against Coderre should serve as a reminder for politicians and government officials everywhere that the features that make a city special should be protected; if they aren’t, its residents will fight for them. Here’s hoping that in Montréal the outcome is happier than in my neighbourhood, that views (in both senses of the word) are respected and that the city itself isn’t denuded by poor planning and tall tales about density.