Opinion / James Chambers
Violent means
Hong Kong’s yellow umbrella protest movement occupied the streets of the Admiralty district a few months after I arrived in 2014. Coming from London it was a marvel to walk through the temporary camp and see high-school pupils doing their homework under torchlight while brandishing brollies in support of the cause. Fast-forward to 2019’s protests and young people were setting subway stations alight, hurling Molotov cocktails at police and beating up those with contrasting opinions. Hong Kong’s studious and mild-mannered children had become angrier and more willing to embrace violence.
With the introduction of the national security law last year, it was easy to see how this blunt and easily abused weapon could drive a small number of these radicalised activists deeper underground. A week before the national security law (NSL) was passed, I interviewed two prominent – and peaceful – activists, one of whom is currently in jail awaiting trial on NSL charges. I asked them whether the NSL could sow the seeds for a Hong Kong equivalent to the IRA, ETA or Farc. One thought it impossible given the level of surveillance in Hong Kong and lack of space. The one thing that none of us foresaw was that it would be heading in that direction within 12 months.
Yesterday’s arrest of nine suspects, including some teenagers, for allegedly planning to bomb courthouses and cross-harbour tunnels, comes less than a week after a 50-year-old man stabbed a policeman in Causeway Bay before killing himself. Several other plots have been foiled in the past year, although many refuse to believe police accounts. If history has taught us anything it’s that a violent struggle rarely brings about a peaceful outcome. Hong Kongers on all sides should know this. Activists should stick to peaceful means and those in power should extend an olive branch. Sadly for Hong Kong, plan A is to turn the security screws even tighter and there appears to be little sign of a plan B.