Opinion / Chiara Rimella
Homing signals
Putting together a quality of life index like the one that Monocle will release next week in our July/August issue always raises a lot of questions, starting with what criteria to consider and how to weigh them against each other. Researchers for rankings of this kind often focus on what life is like for middle-aged professionals looking for good job prospects and affordable living.
Finance broadsheet Il Sole 24 Ore has run Italy’s most highly esteemed quality of life index for years and the business powerhouses of the northeast have long dominated. But since last year the paper has divided its findings by age group and the results have been more mixed. Different parameters have been used to ascertain the best Italian city to call home if you’re a child, an adult between the ages of 18 and 35, or elderly. For children, the number of playgrounds and access to good schools might be what matter most, so the northern city of Aosta comes first place. A young professional, by contrast, might care more about how many businesses have owners under 35 or how many nightclubs are open in the vicinity; in which case, central Italy’s Piacenza takes the top spot. The longer lived might be more interested in the number of urban vegetable patches, the quality of geriatric healthcare and the level of noise complaints; for them, Cagliari (pictured) in Sardinia is the winner.
What’s perhaps most interesting is that none of these cities works for all age groups. Piacenza is best for young adults but comes 75th for children, while Cagliari is great for the elderly but takes the 80th spot for younger people. But isn’t this to be expected? What we want from life changes with time. In due course, perhaps our address should too.
Chiara Rimella is Monocle’s culture editor and deputy editor of our sister publication ‘Konfekt’. To reserve your copy of Monocle’s July/August Quality of Life issue, subscribe today.