Opinion / Genevieve Bates
Holding back the years
In London, the V&A Museum’s first new exhibition since the pandemic began opened on Saturday. Bags: Inside Out aims to juxtapose contemporary signifiers of mass luxury with historic military, medical and ceremonial bags. Among the items on display are Jane Birkin’s original Hermès namesake, Winston Churchill’s despatch box and one of Margaret Thatcher’s ladylike signatures, which gave rise to the use of “handbag” as a verb, meaning to bully or coerce (usually said of a woman hectoring a man). Curator Lucia Savi says that the signs of wear on the displayed pieces “remind us that bags are status symbols but also practical companions to our everyday life”.
Followers of fashion will hardly need to read the museum’s display cards to identify some of the more contemporary items such as Gucci’s Jackie bag, Chanel’s 2.55 quilted classic or more recent bags by Supreme and Off-White. I would usually argue that fashion deserves to be seen in museums but there were moments when it felt slightly ridiculous to peer through the glass at Fendi and Prada pieces that could be seen down the road at Harrods or, in a few cases, in my own wardrobe. Viewed as a group, the most coveted bags of the past century reveal more about the evolution of travel and celebrity culture than our fashion tastes.
Perhaps the greatest value of the exhibition lies in its intriguing connection of our current consumer culture with the past. Cotton totes bearing environmental messages today continue a tradition evidenced by the anti-slavery mottos embroidered on a ladies’ workbag from 1829. Paco Rabanne’s metal belt bag of the 1960s is an update on an iron-filigree purse from 1660s Nuremberg. And the tiny dangling jewelled chatelaines of the 1860s (pictured) make clear that miniature bags weren’t invented by Jacquemus in 2017. I left the exhibition feeling that the joy of carrying a smart bag today is part of a valid and long-standing historical continuum, rather than a sign of shallow consumerism.